#~~~~# SELECT * FROM DAvidKanal WHERE Chan="UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA"

#~++~# UPdate DAvidKanal SET tsl ="1727525533" , tsc ="1727611533" WHERE Chan="UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA"

#~~~~# http://ssl.tycuun.de/ABruf.php?URL=https://www.youtube.com/feeds/videos.xml?channel_id=UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA

**45284

**?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> feed xmlns:yt="http://www.youtube.com/xml/schemas/2015" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"> link rel="self" href="http://www.youtube.com/feeds/videos.xml?channel_id=UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA"/> id>yt:channel:59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/id> yt:channelId>59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>Wattafps/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2019-07-28T07:28:02+00:00/published> entry> id>yt:video:kad-cVkwjp0/id> yt:videoId>kad-cVkwjp0/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>Ryzen 5 7600X DDR5 4800 vs 6000 vs 6400 memory scaling with KF556C40BBK2-32/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kad-cVkwjp0"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2022-10-10T15:39:44+00:00/published> updated>2024-09-23T22:50:20+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>Ryzen 5 7600X DDR5 4800 vs 6000 vs 6400 memory scaling with KF556C40BBK2-32/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/kad-cVkwjp0?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i4.ytimg.com/vi/kad-cVkwjp0/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>As AMD steated DDR5 6000MHz is sweet spot. In cpu heavy titles DDR5 6000 with adjusted timings can be ~20% faster than DDR5 4800 CL40. KF556C40BBK2-32 XMP is 5600 CL40 but works without any voltage changes with 6000. Lower timings and higher FCLK clock are possiblle with higer voltage. ---------- GPU OC (set in MSI Afterburner) +120MHz Core Clock Limited to 1860MHz ---------- 00:00 Latency 00:02 - Counter-Strike 00:07 - Far Cry New Dawn 01:17 - The Division 2 02:52 - Watch Dogs Legion 04:30 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider Benchmark - GPU bound part 05:02 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider Benchmark - CPU bound part 06:21 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider Benchmark - overall score 06:33 - Cyberpunk 2077 Benchmark 07:46 - Cyberpunk 2077 game play 08:16 - AIDA64 4800 CL40 08:18 - AIDA64 6000 CL40 08:20 - AIDA64 6000 CL30 08:22 - AIDA64 6400 CL32 08:24 - 4800 CL40 BIOS 08:35 - 6000 CL40 BIOS 08:45 - 6000 CL30 BIOS 08:55 - 6400 CL32 BIOS 09:06 - Games settings ---------- Motherboard: ASRock X670E PG LIGHTNING CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 7600X Cooler: NH-U12A Ram: DDR5 KINGSTON Fury Beast 32GB 5600MHz GPU: MSI RTX 3090 GAMING X TRIO 24G Disk: Patriot 2TB M.2 PCIe NVMe VPN100 Case: none PSU: EVGA BR 700W 80 Plus Bronze/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="181" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="16506"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:EuIi3hKX7iU/id> yt:videoId>EuIi3hKX7iU/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>RTX 3050 Performance Overclocking RayTracing CPU scaling 3050 vs 3060 vs 3060 Ti MSI RTX 3050 AERO/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuIi3hKX7iU"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2022-02-20T18:39:32+00:00/published> updated>2024-09-24T09:56:45+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>RTX 3050 Performance Overclocking RayTracing CPU scaling 3050 vs 3060 vs 3060 Ti MSI RTX 3050 AERO/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/EuIi3hKX7iU?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i2.ytimg.com/vi/EuIi3hKX7iU/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>3050 should be enough for gaming with high quality settings with over 60fps but most demanding games will need lower settings or DLSS. Performance of 3050 in 1080p is similar to 3090 in 4K Max settings and RT requiers much more faster gpu. ----- Specification, performance, overclocking 00:00 Specification 00:02 Time Spy 00:15 Performance per MHz 00:17 Overclocking 00:57 1 hour of gaming 01:00 - CPU scaling ----- 3050 vs 3060 vs 3060 Ti 02:04 - Far Cry New Dawn 02:37 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider 03:19 - Watch Dogs Legion 03:52 - The Division 2 04:25 - Rainbow Six Siege 04:58 - Cyberpunk 2077 ----- Ray Tracing 05:30 - Control 06:00 - Cyberpunk 2077 ----- Other 06:30 - 3050 FullHd vs 3090 4K ----------/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="15" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="767"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:w0r0fy8r7zg/id> yt:videoId>w0r0fy8r7zg/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>Intel I5 12400 with Laminar RM1 12100 vs 10700 vs 5600X vs 12400 with DDR4 3500 and 3060 Ti/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0r0fy8r7zg"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2022-01-14T13:00:24+00:00/published> updated>2024-08-21T07:17:10+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>Intel I5 12400 with Laminar RM1 12100 vs 10700 vs 5600X vs 12400 with DDR4 3500 and 3060 Ti/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/w0r0fy8r7zg?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i4.ytimg.com/vi/w0r0fy8r7zg/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>I5 12400 is cpu similar to I7 10700. Similar multicore, bit better gaming performance but faster single core performance with lower power draw. Main issue for 12400 as for now is high price of motherboards for 12 gen cpus. Both 12100 (~50Watts) and 12100 (~75Watts) shoud work on cheap motherboards and can be cooled with stock cooler. ---------- 3500MHz was highest possible speed for ram. With 3600 and above applications were crashing. Scores for 12400 can be all over the place depending tests you are watching. In Hardware Unboxed test with 6900XT, in a lot of games 5600X can be significantly faster. In Gamers Nexus test with RTX 3080, differencies are almost gone. In tests from benchmark chanells 12400 is almost always winning but by small margin. If motherboard/cpu combo is in same price I would go with 5600X with B550 board over 12400 with B660 board. I wouldn't buy any H610 board - they are loosing much of funcionality. For gaming only desktop I would stick to I3 12100 - it is only few % slower than 12400. For productivity tasks I would go with overclocked 12600K or 12700. They are at least 50% faster than 12400 in cpu heavy applications. If 12400 is not more than 50% expensive than 12100 I would go with 12400 over I3 12100. ---------- GPU OC (set in MSI Afterburner) +150MHz Core Clock Limited to 1860MHz (performance like stock settings) ---------- Games benchmarks: 00:00 Applications 00:06 Performance per Watt (vs 5600X) 00:33 Power limits 00:46 Undervolting 01:05 Setup (ram timings, ram speed, performance at end of CB23-temps, frequency, power) 01:08 - Far Cry New Dawn 02:18 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider 03:52 - Watch Dogs Legion 05:29 - The Division 2 07:04 - Rainbow Six Siege 08:23 - Cyberpunk 2077 ---------- Motherboard: MSI MEG Z490I UNIFY, MSI PRO Z690-A, MSI B550-A PRO CPU: Intel I3 12100, I7 10700 , R5 5600X, I5 12400 Cooler: Laminar RM1 (12100 and 12400), Fera 5 (10700), NH-U12A (5600X) Ram: Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 16GB (2x8GB) stock 16-18-18-38-630-38 TCL-TRCD-TRP-TRAS-TRFC-TFAW (12100 and 10700), 3800 (no manual timings change) (5600X) and 3500 (no manual timings change) (12400) GPU: Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060Ti Eagle Disk: ADATA SX8200 PRO Case: none PSU: Corsair SF600 600W/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="82" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="7573"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:24jKDpeY4WQ/id> yt:videoId>24jKDpeY4WQ/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>Intel I3 12100 with Laminar RM1 12100 vs 10100 vs 10400 vs 11400 with DDR4 3600 and 3060 Ti/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24jKDpeY4WQ"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2022-01-09T17:33:05+00:00/published> updated>2024-08-21T16:33:12+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>Intel I3 12100 with Laminar RM1 12100 vs 10100 vs 10400 vs 11400 with DDR4 3600 and 3060 Ti/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/24jKDpeY4WQ?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i3.ytimg.com/vi/24jKDpeY4WQ/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>Left --- I3 10100 Middle Left --- I5 10400 Middle Right --- I3 12100 Right --- I5 11400 --------- 12100 is cpu similar to 10400. Similar multicore and gaming performance but faster single core performance and lower power draw. Main issue for 12100 is high price of motherboards for 12 gen cpus. 10100 (~60Watts), 10400 (~70Watts) and 12100 (~55Watts) can work on cheap motherboards and can be cooled with stock cooler. 11400 (~110Watts ) should be paired with board with better vrm section and with aftermarket cooler. With similar price for cpu+motherboard combo 12100 could be better buy than 10400 ---------- GPU OC (set in MSI Afterburner) +150MHz Core Clock Limited to 1860MHz (performance like stock settings) ---------- Games benchmarks: 00:28 - Far Cry New Dawn 01:38 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider 03:11 - Watch Dogs Legion 04:49 - The Division 2 06:24 - Rainbow Six Siege 07:43 - Cyberpunk 2077 ---------- Motherboard: MSI MEG Z490I UNIFY, MSI PRO Z690-A CPU: Intel I3 10100, I5 10400 , I3 12100, I5 11400 Cooler: Intel stock cooler E97379-003 (10100 and 10400), Laminar RM1 (12100), NH-U12A (11400) Ram: Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 16GB (2x8GB) stock 16-18-18-38-630-38 TCL-TRCD-TRP-TRAS-TRFC-TFAW GPU: Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060Ti Eagle Disk: ADATA SX8200 PRO Case: none PSU: Corsair SF600 600W/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="66" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="6028"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:3wTQ1r6Fcvw/id> yt:videoId>3wTQ1r6Fcvw/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>10100 vs 10400 with DDR4 2666 vs 3600 10100F and 10400F with 3060 TI in 1080p/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wTQ1r6Fcvw"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2022-01-07T22:32:03+00:00/published> updated>2024-08-25T05:43:57+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>10100 vs 10400 with DDR4 2666 vs 3600 10100F and 10400F with 3060 TI in 1080p/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/3wTQ1r6Fcvw?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i4.ytimg.com/vi/3wTQ1r6Fcvw/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>In cpu demanding games I3 10100 will bottleneck faster gpus. 10100 is great cpu for budget builds and should be paired rather with cheap (40-60$) motherboards and stock cooler. If you consider buy of better quality board (f.e. B560 80-100$) for memory overclocking I would move these founds into I5 upgrade. 10400 with DDR4 2666 will be faster than 10100 with overclocked DDR4 . Stock cooler is also enough to keep 10100 enough cool and quiet. When budget limited I would go with: -10100F+cheap motherboard+stock cooler -For additional 50-60$ you should be able to upgrade to 10400F+cheap motherboard+stock cooler ---------- GPU OC (set in MSI Afterburner) +150MHz Core Clock Limited to 1860MHz (performance like stock settings) ---------- Games benchmarks: 00:16 - Far Cry New Dawn 01:26 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider 02:59 - Watch Dogs Legion 04:37 - The Division 2 06:12 - Rainbow Six Siege 07:31 - Cyberpunk 2077 ---------- Motherboard: MSI MEG Z490I UNIFY CPU: Intel I3 10100(F), I5 10400(F) Cooler: Intel stock cooler Ram: Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 16GB (2x8GB) stock and set to 2666MHz 12-14-14-29-480-5-7-29 TCL-TRCD-TRP-TRAS-TRFC-TRRD_S-TRRD_L-TFAW (timings from XMP profile) GPU: Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060Ti Eagle Disk: ADATA SX8200 PRO Case: none PSU: Corsair SF600 600W/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="20" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="741"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:ZUPQ6dnCH7o/id> yt:videoId>ZUPQ6dnCH7o/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>Acer Swift X vs budget desktop 5600U RTX 3050 vs 10100F GTX 1650/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUPQ6dnCH7o"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2022-01-02T12:36:19+00:00/published> updated>2024-09-24T15:36:13+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>Acer Swift X vs budget desktop 5600U RTX 3050 vs 10100F GTX 1650/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/ZUPQ6dnCH7o?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i3.ytimg.com/vi/ZUPQ6dnCH7o/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>5600U is much faster than 10100F. 35Watt RTX 3050 has similar performance as GTX 1650. Swift X performance in games is bottlenecked by cpu low limit (15Watts) and probablly also by high latency ram. This very small and light ultrabook can replace I3 desktop for cpu intensive tasks and is more than enough for casual gaming./media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="8" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="396"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:9W5InpRGZSc/id> yt:videoId>9W5InpRGZSc/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>Fera 5 vs Fortis 5 424g vs 650g cooler Does 50% "more" help?/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9W5InpRGZSc"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2021-12-22T17:33:20+00:00/published> updated>2024-08-26T13:54:53+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>Fera 5 vs Fortis 5 424g vs 650g cooler Does 50% "more" help?/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/9W5InpRGZSc?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i2.ytimg.com/vi/9W5InpRGZSc/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>Left --- Fera 5 ~25$ should be available in some European countries https://www.silentiumpc.com/en/product/fera-5/ Right --- Fortis 5 ~50$ should be available in some European countries https://www.silentiumpc.com/pl/product/fortis-5/ Fortis 5 tests with Ryzen 390X and 10900K https://www.techpowerup.com/review/silentiumpc-fortis-5-fortis-5-dual-fan-cpu-air-coolers/ Fortis 5 tests with Ryzen 3600 https://www.igorslab.de/en/silentiumpc-fortis-5-dual-im-test-2/3/ Fera 5 tests with Ryzen 5950 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4mALQdCYZ8&t=80s --------- In my environment 33dBA is inaudible, 45dBA is still very quiet. - 140 Watts from 10th. generation I7 can be cooled inaudible even by small 400g cooler - even 170 Watts doesnt differiants coolers much -200 Watts load requires fast fans. NH-U12A is very efficient cooler, but on same noise levels has similar performance to Fortis 5. - Fortis 5 is 50% more (650g vs 424g and 6 vs 4 heatpipes) than Fera 5, but can lower temperature by only few degrees. Unfortunately Fortis 5 fan is spinning at low max rpm 1300. ---------- 00:05 - 5.0GHz 200W (stock voltage) 00:33 - 5.0GHz 170W (-100mV undervolt) 01:01 - 4.8GHz 140W (-100mV undervolt) ---------- Thermal paste: Arctic MX-5 Motherboard: MSI MEG Z490I UNIFY CPU: Intel I5 10700K Cooler: Fera 5, Fortis 5, NH-U12A Ram: Patriot 4400MHz CL19 Viper Steel 16GB (2x8GB) GPU: Zotac GTX 1650 Disk: ADATA SX8200 PRO Case: none PSU: Corsair SF600 600W/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="26" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="3244"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:liSyAJllLUw/id> yt:videoId>liSyAJllLUw/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>5600X vs 12600K Cinebench R23 overclocking undervolting Performance per Watt/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liSyAJllLUw"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2021-12-13T00:25:46+00:00/published> updated>2024-09-24T09:23:10+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>5600X vs 12600K Cinebench R23 overclocking undervolting Performance per Watt/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/liSyAJllLUw?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i1.ytimg.com/vi/liSyAJllLUw/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>Left --- 5600X Right --- 12600K (F) ------------ 12600K has better performance per Watt, but have 4 additional efficiency cores. E-cores requires higher voltage than P-cores, P-cores alone should work with lower voltage. 12600K is great cpu for small PCs with 60-80Watt cpu limit ---------- Motherboard: MSI B550-A PRO (5600X), MSI PRO Z690-A (12600K) CPU: 5600X, 12600K Cooler: NH-U12A (5600X), SilentiumPC Fera 5 (12600K) Ram: Crucial Ballistix 3600 16GB (2x8GB) GPU: Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060Ti Eagle Disk: ADATA SX8200 PRO Case: none PSU: Corsair SF600 600W/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="40" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="4196"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:Cmn5pZf4rlw/id> yt:videoId>Cmn5pZf4rlw/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>12600K vs 5600X vs 10700 RTX 3060 TI 1080p/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cmn5pZf4rlw"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2021-12-05T20:19:35+00:00/published> updated>2024-08-19T21:05:29+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>12600K vs 5600X vs 10700 RTX 3060 TI 1080p/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/Cmn5pZf4rlw?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i4.ytimg.com/vi/Cmn5pZf4rlw/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>Left --- I5 10700 (F) Time Spy Graphics score 11531 Middle Left --- 5600X Time Spy Graphics score 11741, Time Spy CPU score 9174, CineBench R23 12166 Middle Right --- I5 12600K stock Time Spy Graphics score 11737, Time Spy CPU score 13433, CineBench R23 17404 Right --- I5 12600K (F) 5.0GHz Time Spy Graphics score 11739, Time Spy CPU score 14787, CineBench R23 19613 --------- 10700 is 10700K with 10700 clocks 10700 is used with fast B-Die memory, because it can work with faster DDR4 than other 2 cpus. 5600X is overclocked, with ram overclocked and few timings adjusted. 12600K stock is working with stock memory 12600K OC has adjusted timings for memory ---------- GPU OC (set in MSI Afterburner) +150MHz Core Clock Limited to 1860MHz (performance like stock settings) ---------- Games benchmarks: 00:06 - Far Cry New Dawn 01:16 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider 02:50 - Watch Dogs Legion 04:27 - The Division 2 06:03 - Rainbow Six Siege 07:22 - Cyberpunk 2077 ---------- Motherboard: MSI MEG Z490I UNIFY (10700), MSI B550-A PRO (5600X), MSI PRO Z690-A (12600K) CPU: Intel I5 10700, 5600X, I5 12600K Cooler: NH-U12A (10700, 5600X), SilentiumPC Fera 5 (12600K) Ram: Patriot 4400MHz CL19 Viper Steel 16GB (2x8GB) set to 4000MHz 15-15-15-35-320-18 TCL-TRCD-TRP-TRAS-TRFC-TFAW (10700) Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 16GB (2x8GB) set to 3800MHz 16-18-18-35-53-560-16 TCL-TRCD-TRP-TRAS-TRC-TRFC-TFAW (5600X) Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 16GB (2x8GB) stock 16-18-18-38-630-38 TCL-TRCD-TRP-TRAS-TRFC-TFAW (12600K) Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 16GB (2x8GB) stock 15-17-17-32-540-16 TCL-TRCD-TRP-TRAS-TRFC-TFAW (12600K) GPU: Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060Ti Eagle Disk: ADATA SX8200 PRO Case: none PSU: Corsair SF600 600W/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="18" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="2077"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:EAbcnIJCQGo/id> yt:videoId>EAbcnIJCQGo/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>Intel I5 12600K Cinebench R23 overclocking undervolting Performance per Watt with small cooler/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAbcnIJCQGo"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2021-11-23T14:20:28+00:00/published> updated>2024-09-24T12:53:30+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>Intel I5 12600K Cinebench R23 overclocking undervolting Performance per Watt with small cooler/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/EAbcnIJCQGo?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i2.ytimg.com/vi/EAbcnIJCQGo/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>Left --- I5 12600K (F) Right --- I5 12600K (F) undervolted ------------ Cooling is possible even with small cooler (about 500g, 4 heatpipes) for 4.9GHz. With voltage ~1.25V, power draw should be about 140-150Watts. Like on 11 generation Frequency/Voltage courve can be bit strange: - 60-70Watt no performance improvement - After undervolting voltage is almost the same for 70-100Watt limit - After undervolting between 60 and 80 Watts voltage and performance is the same as without undervolting. *********In beta bios1.13 scalling with wattage is much better Watts - 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 , 100, 110, 120 stock voltage - 7714, 11039, 12841, 13474, 14215, 16001, 16509, 16976, 17358 undervolt - 10185, 11655, 12782, 13575, 14229, 16099, 17406 Still between 50 and 90 Watts there is no performance difference after undervolting. ---------- Cooler is SilentiumPC Fera 5. About 500g cooler with 4 heatpipes with one 120mm fan ---------- MSI PRO Z690-A CPU: Intel I5 12600K Cooler: SilentiumPC Fera 5 Ram: Crucial Ballistix 3600 16GB (2x8GB) 16-18-18-38 GPU: Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060Ti Eagle Disk: ADATA SX8200 PRO Case: none PSU: Corsair SF600 600W/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="155" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="13585"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:7KHhQGdzVec/id> yt:videoId>7KHhQGdzVec/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>10400 vs 11400 vs 12600K RTX 3060 TI/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KHhQGdzVec"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2021-11-17T18:57:45+00:00/published> updated>2024-08-27T13:53:23+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>10400 vs 11400 vs 12600K RTX 3060 TI/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/7KHhQGdzVec?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i4.ytimg.com/vi/7KHhQGdzVec/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>Left --- I5 10400 (F) Time Spy Graphics score 11565, Time Spy CPU score 7536, CineBench R20 3146 Middle --- I5 11400 (F) Time Spy Graphics score 11471, Time Spy CPU score 8686, CineBench R20 3913 Right --- I5 12600K (F) Time Spy Graphics score 11646, Time Spy CPU score 13596, CineBench R20 6677 ---------- GPU OC (set in MSI Afterburner) +150MHz Core Clock Limited to 1860MHz (performance like stock settings) ---------- Games benchmarks: 00:10 - Far Cry New Dawn 01:26 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider 03:04 - Watch Dogs Legion 04:44 - The Division 2 06:23 - Rainbow Six Siege 07:42 - Cyberpunk 2077 ---------- Motherboard: MSI MEG Z490I UNIFY (10400), B560M AORUS PRO (11400), MSI PRO Z690-A (12600K) CPU: Intel I5 10400, I5 11400, I5 12600K Cooler: NH-U12A (10400, 11400), SilentiumPC Fera 5 (12600K) Ram: Crucial Ballistix 3600 16GB (2x8GB) 16-18-18-38 GPU: Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060Ti Eagle Disk: ADATA SX8200 PRO Case: none PSU: Corsair SF600 600W/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="102" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="11895"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:x-5Qwhzmu7k/id> yt:videoId>x-5Qwhzmu7k/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>RTX 3060 10400 vs 1140 vs 10700 vs 11700 on B560 Steel Legend/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-5Qwhzmu7k"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2021-06-13T20:52:27+00:00/published> updated>2024-08-23T20:05:29+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>RTX 3060 10400 vs 1140 vs 10700 vs 11700 on B560 Steel Legend/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/x-5Qwhzmu7k?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i1.ytimg.com/vi/x-5Qwhzmu7k/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>Left --- I5 10400 (F) Time Spy Graphics score 9194, Time Spy CPU score 7602, CineBench R20 3161 (scores without screen recording) Middle left --- I5 11400 (F) Time Spy Graphics score 9168, Time Spy CPU score 8770, CineBench R20 3976(scores without screen recording) Middle right --- I7 1070 (F) Time Spy Graphics score 9227, Time Spy CPU score 11000, CineBench R20 4840 (scores without screen recording) Right --- I7 11700 (F) Time Spy Graphics score 9138, Time Spy CPU score 12241, CineBench R20 5482 (scores without screen recording) --------- 10700 simulated by setting 10700K to 46,46,46,46,47,47,48,48 multiplayers. On B560 motherboards ram can work with XMP profile enabled. B560 Steel Legend work up to 3733MHz in Gear 1 and can handle 11700 without power limits. 1 hour FPU AIDA64 stress test ended with 174-184 Watts of power draw without any drops. ---------- GPU OC (set in MSI Afterburner) +180MHz Core Clock ---------- Screen was recorded with Nvidia Shadow Play. Performance is higher without recording. Games benchmarks: 00:00 - Far Cry New Dawn 01:16 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider 02:54 - Watch Dogs Legion 04:34 - The Division 2 06:13 - Rainbow Six Siege 07:32 - Cyberpunk 2077 08:02 - Project Cars 2 08:30 - Watch Dogs 2 ------------------------------- For 11 gen Intel cpus I would choose only motherboards, which can handle 11700 without power limits. Even for 10400, because after 3-4 years 11700 will be next possible upgrade. I wouldnâ€™t buy: MSI: B560M PRO - to weak VRM for 11700 Gigabyte: B560M D2V - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M DS3H AC - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M DS3H - to weak VRM for 11700 B560 HD3 - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M D3H - to weak VRM for 11700 GA-B560M-D3P - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M DS3H - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M POWER - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M GAMING HD - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M H - to weak VRM for 11700 Asrock: B560M-HDV - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M-HDV-A - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M Pro4- vrm hot for 11700 B560M Pro4/ac - vrm hot for 11700 B560M Pro4/ac+ - vrm hot for 11700 B560 Pro4 - vrm hot for 11700 Asus: PRIME B560M-K - to weak VRM for 11700 TUF GAMING B560M-E - to weak VRM for 11700 PRIME B560M-A - to weak VRM for 11700 PRIME B560-PLUS - to weak VRM for 11700 EX-B560M-V5 - to weak VRM for 11700 B5560M-P - to weak VRM for 11700 I would buy: MSI: B560M PRO-VDH MAG B560M BAZOOKA MAG B560M MORTAR MAG B560 TORPEDO MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI Gigabyte: B560M AORUS ELITE B560M AORUS PRO B560M AORUS PRO AX B560 AORUS PRO AX Asrock: B560M Steel Legend B560 Steel Legend Asus: TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI ROG STRIX B560-A GAMING WIFI ROG STRIX B560-E GAMING WIFI ROG STRIX B560-F GAMING WIFI ROG STRIX B560-G GAMING WIFI ------------------------------- Motherboard: Asrock B560 Steel Legend CPU: Intel I5 10400 I5 11400 I7 10700 I7 11700 Cooler: NH-U12A Ram: Crucial Ballistix 3600 16GB (2x8GB) 16-18-18-38 GPU: Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Pegasus OC 720p Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB PLEXTOR PX-1TM8SeG 1000GB Case: none PSU: HDPLEX 400W HiFi DC-ATX + HDPLEX 400W AC-DC/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="82" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="7470"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:KSzQ0LgXtss/id> yt:videoId>KSzQ0LgXtss/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>Intel I7 11700 Memory support on Asrock B560 Steel Legend/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSzQ0LgXtss"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2021-06-02T18:25:23+00:00/published> updated>2024-08-19T04:49:58+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>Intel I7 11700 Memory support on Asrock B560 Steel Legend/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/KSzQ0LgXtss?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i4.ytimg.com/vi/KSzQ0LgXtss/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>Left --- I7 11700 with stock Crucial Ballistix 3600 16-18-18-38 https://www.crucial.com/memory/ddr4/bl2k8g36c16u4b Middle --- I7 11700 with Crucial Ballistix 3600 at 3733MHz with some timings adjusted. Right --- I7 11700 with Patriot B-Die 4400MHz memory at 3733MHz with some timings adjusted https://assets.website-files.com/5cdb2ee0b102f96c3906500f/606b5ed1885677adcf9b5a5f_PVS416G440C9K_Sku%20Sheet_040221.pdf Fps numbers are average from 3 runs without screen recording. B560 Steel Legend work up to 3733MHz in Gear 1 and can handle 11700 without power limits. 1 hour FPU AIDA64 stress test ended with 174-184 Watts of power draw without any drops. To simulate faster card 720p resolution was used with RTX 3060. Framerate is similar to RTX 3070. W --------- I7 11700 multiplayers for active cores - 1,2 - 49x, 3,4 - 47x, 5,6 - 46x, 7 - 45x, 8 - 44x. During 100% cpu load 11700 needs ~170 Watt. During gaming with decant fast card over 100 Watt. ---------- Games benchmarks: 00:00 - Far Cry New Dawn 01:16 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider 02:54 - Watch Dogs Legion 04:34 - The Division 2 06:13 - Rainbow Six Siege 07:32 - Cyberpunk 2077 08:02 - Project Cars 2 08:30 - Watch Dogs 2 BALLISTIX 3600 Stock BALLISTIX 3600 @3733 Patriot 4400 @3733 1.Run Read MB/s 53969 55386 57559 1.Run Write MB/s 52531 55199 56570 1.Run Copy MB/s 51662 54869 56985 1.Run Latency ns 46,7 45,2 41,6 2.Run Read MB/s 53933 55584 57669 2.Run Write MB/s 52439 55178 56461 2.Run Copy MB/s 52459 54319 55750 2.Run Latency ns 46,8 45,3 41,1 3.Run Read MB/s 53882 55399 58013 3.Run Write MB/s 52184 55247 56566 3.Run Copy MB/s 52468 54513 56907 3.Run Latency ns 46,8 45,4 41,6 CR 2 2 2 tCL 16 16 15 tRCD 18 18 14 tRP 18 18 14 tRAS 38 35 28 tRFC 630 540 250 tREFI 14029 14580 14580 tWR 24 10 10 tWTR 5 5 12 tWTR_L 14 14 14 tRRD 8 9 9 tRRD_L 11 11 8 tRTP 12 6 6 tFAW 38 16 16 tCWL 16 9 9 tCKE 8 8 8 tRDRDSG 8 8 8 tRDRDDG 4 4 4 tRDRDDR 9 9 9 tRDRDDD 10 10 10 tWRWRSG 8 8 8 tWRWRDG 4 4 4 tWRWRDR 9 9 9 tWRWRDD 9 9 9 tRDWRSG 10 17 16 tRDWRDG 10 17 16 tRDWRDR 12 14 18 tRDWRDD 13 20 19 tWRRDSG 36 29 29 tWRRDDG 27 20 27 tWRRDDR 10 6 6 tWRRDDD 10 6 6 ------------------------------- For 11 gen Intel cpus I would choose only motherboards, which can handle 11700 without power limits. Even for 10400, because after 3-4 years 11700 will be next possible upgrade. I wouldnâ€™t buy: MSI: B560M PRO - to weak VRM for 11700 Gigabyte: B560M D2V - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M DS3H AC - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M DS3H - to weak VRM for 11700 B560 HD3 - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M D3H - to weak VRM for 11700 GA-B560M-D3P - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M DS3H - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M POWER - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M GAMING HD - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M H - to weak VRM for 11700 Asrock: B560M-HDV - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M-HDV-A - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M Pro4- vrm hot for 11700 B560M Pro4/ac - vrm hot for 11700 B560M Pro4/ac+ - vrm hot for 11700 B560 Pro4 - vrm hot for 11700 Asus: PRIME B560M-K - to weak VRM for 11700 TUF GAMING B560M-E - to weak VRM for 11700 PRIME B560M-A - to weak VRM for 11700 PRIME B560-PLUS - to weak VRM for 11700 EX-B560M-V5 - to weak VRM for 11700 B5560M-P - to weak VRM for 11700 I would buy: MSI: B560M PRO-VDH MAG B560M BAZOOKA MAG B560M MORTAR MAG B560 TORPEDO MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI Gigabyte: B560M AORUS ELITE B560M AORUS PRO B560M AORUS PRO AX B560 AORUS PRO AX Asrock: B560M Steel Legend B560 Steel Legend Asus: TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI ROG STRIX B560-A GAMING WIFI ROG STRIX B560-E GAMING WIFI ROG STRIX B560-F GAMING WIFI ROG STRIX B560-G GAMING WIFI ------------------------------- Motherboard: Asrock B560 Steel Legend CPU: Intel I7 11700 Cooler: NH-U12A Ram: Samsung B-Die - Patriot 16GB (2x8GB) 4400MHz CL19 Viper Steel and Crucial Ballistix 3600 16GB (2x8GB) GPU: Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Pegasus OC 720p Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB PLEXTOR PX-1TM8SeG 1000GB Case: none PSU: HDPLEX 400W HiFi DC-ATX + HDPLEX 400W AC-DC/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="13" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="1191"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:-99Ko5Gy9-g/id> yt:videoId>-99Ko5Gy9-g/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>Intel I5 10400 vs 11400 vs 10700 Gaming performance./title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-99Ko5Gy9-g"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2021-05-01T12:12:55+00:00/published> updated>2024-09-24T05:22:29+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>Intel I5 10400 vs 11400 vs 10700 Gaming performance./media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/-99Ko5Gy9-g?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i2.ytimg.com/vi/-99Ko5Gy9-g/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>Left --- I5 10400(F) with 2666MHz ram no power limit Time Spy (720p) Score, Time Spy Graphics score 22649, Time Spy CPU score 7639, CineBench R20 3196 (scores without screen recording) Middle left --- I5 11400 with 2666MHz ram no power limit Time Spy (720p) Score, Time Spy Graphics score 22273, Time Spy CPU score 8787, CineBench R20 3961(scores without screen recording) Middle right --- I5 10400(F) with 4000MHz ram no power limit Time Spy (720p) Score, Time Spy Graphics score 22685, Time Spy CPU score 7922, CineBench R20 3201 (scores without screen recording) Right --- I7 10700(F) with 4000MHz ram no power limit Time Spy (720p) Score, Time Spy Graphics score 22690, Time Spy CPU score 11888, CineBench R20 4574 (scores without screen recording) 10700 simulated by setting 10700K to 46,46,46,46,47,47,48,48 multiplayers. To simulate faster card 720p resolution was used with RTX 3060. Framerate is similar to RTX 3070. 00:00 - Far Cry New Dawn 01:16 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider 02:54 - Watch Dogs Legion 04:34 - The Division 2 06:13 - Rainbow Six Siege MSI MEG Z490I UNIFY at least for now (BIOS from 2021-02-04), refused to work with 11400 with ram speeds higher then 2666MHz for gear 1 and 3200MHz for gear 2. --------- I5 10400 multiplayers for active cores - 1 - 43x, 2 - 42x, 3,4 - 41x, 5,6 - 40x. I5 11400 multiplayers for active cores - 1,2 - 44x, 3,4 - 43x, 5,6 - 42x. I7 10700 multiplayers for active cores - 1,2 - 48x, 3,4 - 47x, 5,6,7,8 - 46x. ---------- Screen was recorded with Nvidia Shadow Play. Performance is higher without recording. Games benchmarks: Far Cry New Dawn Shadow of the Tomb Raider Watch Dogs Legion The Division 2 Rainbow Six Siege ------------------------------- For 11 gen Intel cpus I would choose only motherboards, which can handle 11700 without power limits. Even for 10400, because after 3-4 years 11700 will be next possible upgrade. I wouldnâ€™t buy: MSI: B560M PRO - to weak VRM for 11700 Gigabyte: B560M D2V - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M DS3H AC - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M DS3H - to weak VRM for 11700 B560 HD3 - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M D3H - to weak VRM for 11700 GA-B560M-D3P - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M DS3H - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M POWER - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M GAMING HD - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M H - to weak VRM for 11700 Asrock: B560M-HDV - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M-HDV-A - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M Pro4- vrm hot for 11700 B560M Pro4/ac - vrm hot for 11700 B560M Pro4/ac+ - vrm hot for 11700 B560 Pro4 - vrm hot for 11700 Asus: PRIME B560M-K - to weak VRM for 11700 TUF GAMING B560M-E - to weak VRM for 11700 PRIME B560M-A - to weak VRM for 11700 PRIME B560-PLUS - to weak VRM for 11700 EX-B560M-V5 - to weak VRM for 11700 B5560M-P - to weak VRM for 11700 I would buy: MSI: B560M PRO-VDH MAG B560M BAZOOKA MAG B560M MORTAR MAG B560 TORPEDO MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI Gigabyte: B560M AORUS ELITE B560M AORUS PRO B560M AORUS PRO AX B560 AORUS PRO AX Asrock: B560M Steel Legend B560 Steel Legend Asus: TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI ROG STRIX B560-A GAMING WIFI ROG STRIX B560-E GAMING WIFI ROG STRIX B560-F GAMING WIFI ROG STRIX B560-G GAMING WIFI ------------------------------- Motherboard: MSI MEG Z490I UNIFY CPU: Intel I5 10400, I5 11400 and 10700 Cooler: NH-U12A Ram: Samsung B-Die - PVS416G440C9K Patriot 16GB (2x8GB) 4400MHz CL19 Viper Steel set to: 2666MHz tCL 10, tRCD 10, tRP 10, tRAS 28, tRFC 200, tWR 10, tRTP 5, tFAW 14, tCWL 9 rest on auto 4000MHz tCL 15, tRCD 15, tRP 15, tRAS 35, tRFC 320, tWR 12, tRTP 6, tFAW 18, tCWL 10 rest on auto GPU: Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Pegasus OC Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB PLEXTOR PX-1TM8SeG 1000GB Case: none PSU: HDPLEX 400W HiFi DC-ATX + HDPLEX 400W AC-DC/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="54" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="4839"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> entry> id>yt:video:U2eN84M-sL4/id> yt:videoId>U2eN84M-sL4/yt:videoId> yt:channelId>UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/yt:channelId> title>Intel I5 11400 65 Watt vs no limit. Why you shouldn't use I5 with power limit Gaming CB R20 11400F/title> link rel="alternate" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2eN84M-sL4"/> author> name>Wattafps/name> uri>https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC59NOMched3gn09B05g6onA/uri> /author> published>2021-04-21T12:13:28+00:00/published> updated>2024-09-24T10:30:41+00:00/updated> media:group> media:title>Intel I5 11400 65 Watt vs no limit. Why you shouldn't use I5 with power limit Gaming CB R20 11400F/media:title> media:content url="https://www.youtube.com/v/U2eN84M-sL4?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390"/> media:thumbnail url="https://i2.ytimg.com/vi/U2eN84M-sL4/hqdefault.jpg" width="480" height="360"/> media:description>Left --- I5 11400 with 65W limit Time Spy (720p) Score, Time Spy Graphics score 22385, Time Spy CPU score 7186, CineBench R20 3066 (scores without screen recording) Middle --- I5 11400 with 65W limit, undervolted 100mV Time Spy (720p) Score, Time Spy Graphics score 22337, Time Spy CPU score 7635, CineBench R20 3242 (scores without screen recording) Right --- I5 11400 with 288W limit. Time Spy (720p) Score, Time Spy Graphics score 22273, Time Spy CPU score 8787, CineBench R20 3961(scores without screen recording) 00:00 - Far Cry New Dawn 01:16 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider 02:54 - Watch Dogs Legion 04:34 - The Division 2 06:13 - Rainbow Six Siege 07:32 - XTU limits 07:46 - CB R20 CineBench R20 tests were done with Turbo Boost Time Window=1, to show real difference in long time load. To simulate faster card, 720p resolution was used with RTX 3060. Framerate is similar to RTX 3070. With faster cards differance, will be increasing. MSI MEG Z490I UNIFY, at least for now, refused to work with 11400 with ram speeds higher then 2666MHz for gear 1 and 3200MHz for gear 2. With better boards, it should be 3200-3600 gear 1 (maybe 3,5-5% more fps). Intel's 11 generation is faster ~20% with singel and multi core performance from 10 generation. For best performance cpus should be use without power limits. Most motherboards set these limits higher be default, if not, they can be changed in Bios or Intel XTU application. --------- I5 11400 multiplayers for active cores - 1,2 - 44x, 3,4 - 43x, 5,6 - 42x. During 100% cpu load 11400 needs ~110 Watt (in some reviews I saw over 120Watt). During gaming with decant fast card over 80 Watt. ---------- Screen was recorded with Nvidia Shadow Play. Performance is higher without recording. ------------------------------- For 11 gen Intel cpus I would choose only motherboards, which can handle 11700 without power limits. Even for 10400, because after 3-4 years 11700 will be next possible upgrade. I wouldnâ€™t buy: MSI: B560M PRO - to weak VRM for 11700 Gigabyte: B560M D2V - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M DS3H AC - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M DS3H - to weak VRM for 11700 B560 HD3 - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M D3H - to weak VRM for 11700 GA-B560M-D3P - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M DS3H - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M POWER - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M GAMING HD - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M H - to weak VRM for 11700 Asrock: B560M-HDV - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M-HDV-A - to weak VRM for 11700 B560M Pro4- vrm hot for 11700 B560M Pro4/ac - vrm hot for 11700 B560M Pro4/ac+ - vrm hot for 11700 B560 Pro4 - vrm hot for 11700 Asus: PRIME B560M-K - to weak VRM for 11700 TUF GAMING B560M-E - to weak VRM for 11700 PRIME B560M-A - to weak VRM for 11700 PRIME B560-PLUS - to weak VRM for 11700 EX-B560M-V5 - to weak VRM for 11700 B5560M-P - to weak VRM for 11700 I would buy: MSI: B560M PRO-VDH MAG B560M BAZOOKA MAG B560M MORTAR MAG B560 TORPEDO MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI Gigabyte: B560M AORUS ELITE B560M AORUS PRO B560M AORUS PRO AX B560 AORUS PRO AX Asrock: B560M Steel Legend B560 Steel Legend Asus: TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI ROG STRIX B560-A GAMING WIFI ROG STRIX B560-E GAMING WIFI ROG STRIX B560-F GAMING WIFI ROG STRIX B560-G GAMING WIFI ------------------------------- Motherboard: MSI MEG Z490I UNIFY CPU: Intel I7 11400 Cooler: NH-U12A Ram: Samsung B-Die - Patriot 16GB (2x8GB) 4400MHz CL19 Viper Steel set to 2666MHz tCL 10, tRCD 10, tRP 10, tRAS 28, tRFC 200, tWR 10, tRTP 5, tFAW 14, tCWL 9 rest on auto GPU: Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Pegasus OC 720p Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB PLEXTOR PX-1TM8SeG 1000GB Case: none PSU: HDPLEX 400W HiFi DC-ATX + HDPLEX 400W AC-DC/media:description> media:community> media:starRating count="301" average="5.00" min="1" max="5"/> media:statistics views="37802"/> /media:community> /media:group> /entry> /feed>

++++ UPdate DAvidKanal SET tsc=1735525542 WHERE Cid="9289"

30.12.2024 03:25

01.01.1970 01:00