DAvideo
alle Bilder sehen ;)
Designed by: Hinx3
OSWD 2004

Valid HTML 4.01!

SELECT * FROM DAFc WHERE DAFc="UCzNG1VIV2Km6uC4ekliD4Gw"

Atheistic Infiltration of Science

🎞️ · 02.10.2023 · 06:00:16 ··· Montag ⭐ 345 🎬 1632 📺 Paul Ross
🎬 · 02.10.2023 · 06:00:16 ··· Montag
😎 · 03.07.2024 · 15:40:29 ··· MiTTwoch
Did you know that modern science is underpinned by an atheistic presupposition and this presupposition is bound to only atheistic interpretations?

Did you know that the materialistic infiltration of science was a modern hijacking? Its roots can be traced back to the Enlightenment period wherein certain intellectuals wanted all talk of God eliminated from the realm of explanation.

Following the Enlightenment period, agnostics and atheistic thinkers did everything they could to remove theological terminology from scientific pronouncements, and this resulted in atheists and agnostics making statements that reflected atheistic philosophy as opposed to theological terminology.

For example, it was the famed agnostic Carl Sagan who said, “The earth is just a pale blue dot lost in a cosmos of incomprehensible dimensions.” As you can see here, Sagan is merely superimposing his own state of lostness upon the whole cosmos.

Notice how individuals that have already adopted a purely naturalistic
interpretation of existence cannot help but evangelize the rest of us with their
unproven assertions and conclusions. How does Carl Sagan know that the Earth is just a pale blue dot lost in a cosmos of incomprehensible dimensions? The answer is, he doesn’t. He’s simply making that up.

You can thank God, Sagan, and all those who share his purely naturalistic interpretation of reality have zero evidence for their assertions.

Like many other agnostics, atheists and skeptics, Sagan is merely interpreting reality through a materialistic paradigm and in a purely materialistic paradigm you cannot have meaning and purpose, therefore the Earth is lost in a cosmos of incomprehensible dimensions; it’s a given in a purely materialistic interpretation of reality.

It’s dogma, its doctrine, and it’s one of the major pillars of their faith.

The Fathers of the Scientific Revolution were not atheistic in their reasoning and therefore did not subscribe to an accidental random universe that resulted from a bizarre set of inexplicable events happening for no reason and purpose whatsoever.

Unlike the Founding Fathers of the Scientific Revolution these Enlightenment thinkers despised any notion of intelligent causation, rationality and purpose in the universe because they regarded such talk as coded references to God.

They did not want a universe underpinned by a rational moral lawgiver and therefore they replaced God, purpose, rationality and meaning with haphazard randomness, purposeless and pointless inexplicable impersonal forces.

These God deniers knew that randomness renders the universe pointless, meaningless, and purposeless, and turns it into a bizarre set of inexplicable events happening for no reason at all and that suited them perfectly.

They also knew that randomness is not an explanation but an avoidance of explanation. Randomness is itself wholly non-empirical. No scientific advocate of randomness has ever perceived a random event.

Despite what scientists say, all of these claims are philosophical, not scientific. I ask, where does the randomness it’s predicated on originate and how is it possible? How is it different from using magic as an explanation?

After all, randomness is not observable, it's not seen, only inferred hence not empirical, but they did not care about that because randomness renders the universe fundamentally irrational rather than intelligible and thus erases God. Invoking randomness was simply an inference, an inference whose philosophical task was to deny the alternative inference of rational agency.

In short, to avoid the God problem these intellectuals were forced to adopt illogical, irrational explanations for the existence of the universe. For them, all explanations are good as long as purpose, meaning and teleology are rejected at the outset.

Its always a good idea to look into the history of a thing and learning how Enlightenment reasoning infiltrated the scientific way of interpreting the world goes a long way to understanding how we got to this place.

- Paul

· 02.10.2023 · 06:00:16 ··· Montag
U
U
L
L
T
* 1696219216
* 1696219216
X 1632
Y 345
P

C 21217
B 8
V 41
* · 30.07.2022 · 00:00:00 ···
2 · 21.07.2023 · 20:22:44 ···
L · 02.07.2024 · 21:22:09 ···
C · 02.07.2024 · 21:22:15 ···
💘 🖱️
* · 01.01.1970 · 01:00:00 ···
* · 01.01.1970 · 01:00:00 ···

· 01.01.1970 · 01:00:00 ···
**##
🧠 📺

*** · 01.01.1970 · 01:00:00 ··· ::
*2* · 01.01.1970 · 01:00:00 ··· ::
*L* · 01.01.1970 · 01:00:00 ··· ::
*C* · 01.01.1970 · 01:00:00 ··· ::

********